[VIEWED 15980
TIMES]
|
SAVE! for ease of future access.
|
|
The postings in this thread span 3 pages, go to PAGE 1.
This page is only showing last 20 replies
|
|
red alert
Please log in to subscribe to red alert's postings.
Posted on 04-14-06 11:31
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Some people have mistaken my word of caution as anti democracy - which is not the case at all. If we practically look at the current politican situation of Nepal * We want Democracy * we have 7 party alliance who are fighting for multiparty democracy The bigger picture is that this 7 party alliance which is fighting for democracy will need to partner with either the KING or the MAOISTS. Do you feel comfortable with them collaborating with the Maoists or the King? What happens: If the 7 parties ally with the Maoists are bring democracy. It means the King is out. Maoists actively participate in political process. When you consider the bigger picture of Nepal, the 7 parties are not stronger than Maoist to resist them, if the Maoists decided to take control of Kathmand and thus the whole country. These maoists who forcibly enroll the people from villages into their army or kill them, cannot be trusted. If the 7 parties ally with the King and work something out, there is a chance that through political strategying we can someday liberate the kingdom to experience democracy. If the Maoist take over it will be almost impossible, maybe it will take another 100 years or so. So the question is do you want the 7 parties to collaborate with the KING or the MAOISTS?
|
|
|
The postings in this thread span 3 pages, go to PAGE 1.
This page is only showing last 20 replies
|
|
real nepal
Please log in to subscribe to real nepal's postings.
Posted on 04-17-06 2:56
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
He bhaiho, if we make listing of monarchs of the World, I think most BASTARD KING is of Nepal. He is the sucker of Government budget paid by poor tax payers of Nepal. He thinks national properties as his private properties, national army as his private security force.
|
|
|
KnightCrawler
Please log in to subscribe to KnightCrawler's postings.
Posted on 04-17-06 9:08
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
What do u guys think if Maoists come to power and have total control over the Army?? I think it will be a totalitarian rule........Prachanda will be yet another Dictator...as he already is in his own party ! To answer atti-Bho....Yes, I have seen maoists in person...my relatives have been victimized by them in the name of so called People's war.......Got kidnapped, and were given a rifle to fight for them or die fighting......Can you tell me that's a humane way to fight for a cause???
|
|
|
AP98
Please log in to subscribe to AP98's postings.
Posted on 04-17-06 10:22
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
As per the thread, I would go for maoists. Nepal needs complete change.
|
|
|
dPariyar
Please log in to subscribe to dPariyar's postings.
Posted on 04-17-06 10:40
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
People will surely go for freedom. But how are we going to achieve freedom? I do not think Maoists will lead us to freedom. If they come to power, Maoists will start killing in 100 and 200 and people will not even know it. The parties are hopeless unless they cut their friendship with Maoists. So I would go for King for now.
|
|
|
bhusan
Please log in to subscribe to bhusan's postings.
Posted on 04-17-06 10:56
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
It is short sighted to partner with Maoists. If maoist government come into power we will never have the press freedom that we have right now. They will just execute at will at any one not following their guidelines. The king is bad, but to support the Maoist because the king is bad, is like jumping from a frying pan into the fire.
|
|
|
Arko
Please log in to subscribe to Arko's postings.
Posted on 04-17-06 11:16
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
I am also ready to give a shot with Maoists. If they come to mainstream and participate in election what's wrong with that. Keeping king is just being coward. There will be some price to pay if we want to solve the problem. Royals were, are and will be the biggest sucker in the history of Nepal. Maoists can take that path too but they are not as entrenched as Royals. So, it will be easier to destabilize them once elected government gets full power. Even international community will help to get rid of Maoist terrorism if Maoists continue to do as what they have been doing.
|
|
|
AP98
Please log in to subscribe to AP98's postings.
Posted on 04-17-06 11:37
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
i am not trying toadvocate for maoists, what i find intersting is that, since last year the kidnapped victims have returned home safe from the maoists captivity than from the RNA captivity.
|
|
|
BathroomCoffee
Please log in to subscribe to BathroomCoffee's postings.
Posted on 04-17-06 11:42
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Ha ha ha Counting yer Chickens before they are hatched ? he he People willing to give Maoist a chance !!....he he CAN IT WORK ? Now lets look at the practical side of it. The fall of USSR and modernization of China towards cpitalism is evident enough. Just look at how both of those countries run today. China(home of Mao Tse Tung) is under dictatorship( no freedom of speech, the fuking state regulates all aspects of civilian life). And all the MORONS that are running under Democracy Banner think they will have more freedom under the COMMIES ? ha ha ha This is a joke right ?
|
|
|
BathroomCoffee
Please log in to subscribe to BathroomCoffee's postings.
Posted on 04-17-06 11:57
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Then again the king is a fuking useless dick too. He's been sitting on his big fat ass jerkin' off for more than a yr now. Or the blood sucker politicians waitin for their oppertunity to get their fugging Krusi back.
|
|
|
Laataa
Please log in to subscribe to Laataa's postings.
Posted on 04-17-06 1:54
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
One thing I know certainly is - ASS IS BETTER THAN GYANENDRA.
|
|
|
nepali_man
Please log in to subscribe to nepali_man's postings.
Posted on 04-17-06 2:15
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Laataa! I agree with you !.The worst bastard in the world would be better than Gyanendra.I think time has comein Nepal for the change.I wish 7 parties have better vision for smooth transition towards Himalayan republic of Nepal.
|
|
|
BathroomCoffee
Please log in to subscribe to BathroomCoffee's postings.
Posted on 04-17-06 2:31
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
He he Are you sayin Dictatorship is better than him ? Like in China ? Where they can detain and torture you at will ? Where there is no freedom of press(even Internet) ? If there is going to be a change IT SHOULD BE FOR BETTER NOT WORSE. I have never known communist to be Democratic. You think its bad now ? he he If the commies take over I bet you'd want the king to take back the country.
|
|
|
nepali_man
Please log in to subscribe to nepali_man's postings.
Posted on 04-17-06 2:35
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Gyanendra has crossed the limit.I am talking about here democracy without Gyanedra.New democratic Nepal with law and order.No autocrates at all.did I answe ur question
|
|
|
lfc123
Please log in to subscribe to lfc123's postings.
Posted on 04-17-06 2:37
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
bathroomcoffe, yes maoists believe in communist ideals, but the reason why i think they should be given a chance is becasue they have promised in recent days that they are willing to do in concordance with the peoples' wills, adn this is my only hope...i hate commuunism, i would hate it neapl became like peru or china or n. korea.....but if maoists are being flexible with their vision, then we ought to give them a chance. if you think we cannot trust the maoists' words, then we cannot turst anyone's words, no king no SPA no maoists, then what? will you come and lead us?
|
|
|
Bhaute
Please log in to subscribe to Bhaute's postings.
Posted on 04-17-06 2:50
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
:-) lfc123, I 'm thinking exactly the same way you do.
|
|
|
bidhan408
Please log in to subscribe to bidhan408's postings.
Posted on 04-17-06 2:52
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
I disagree. Cant believe in the maoist who still carry guns.
|
|
|
lfc123
Please log in to subscribe to lfc123's postings.
Posted on 04-17-06 3:00
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
bhaute, thanks. glad to know someone udnerstands what i am saying. bidhan, you are at full liberty to not trsut the maoists. and i see where that is coming from. but who would you trust? the RNA who kill civilians in prisoners and claim that these prisions committed sucide using their shoelaces? twice that happened? you would trust the RNA who killed its own member who killed 12 other innocent civilians in nagakrkot for the sake of its reputation? trust might be the wrong word....maoists are as much nepali as u and i are. every single politlcal party, belief and agenda must be given a chance. sure there might be royalists, let them come ahead and hold elections and lets see who is the most popular. if the majoirty of nepalis want the monarchy to stay, then that says it all..... giving the moasits is not gonig to solve all our problems. in fact, our crisis will be far from over, but it will at least adress the most pressing issue of our country and that is the insurgency.
|
|
|
BathroomCoffee
Please log in to subscribe to BathroomCoffee's postings.
Posted on 04-17-06 3:35
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Its been 10yrs since the Mao's started their insurgency. WHat assuance do we have that they will not revert to violence again to get what they want ? I have nothing against RNA. Its the officers who give out the orders that are bad. Look at Pakisthan, Musharraf is trying to keep their country afloat from the Mullahs !!! When the Mao's hide amongst the innocent civilians what are the RNA supposed to do ? It is a full fleged war going on. There are bound to be causuaties on both sides. And both side are guilty. I don't trust either of them.
|
|
|
once in a while
Please log in to subscribe to once in a while's postings.
Posted on 04-17-06 5:20
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
< If the Maoist take over it will be almost impossible, maybe it will take another 100 years or so. >> I can just feel pity on your hypothesis Red Alert! Neither the monarchy nor the maoism can dominate democracy. We don't need democracy in alm from the king nor we have the fear of maoist dictatorship. Democracy never gets defeated. Why should the parties ally the king who gives us bullet and curfew and batons? The movement of 2046 was already set to dump the monarchy in tukucha but these are parties who carried the monarchy on thier head and as a result the parties have been sidelined. So, why the heck we have to ally the king any more? At the moment, we should ally the maoist and try to disarm them and bring them to main political line. If they don't correct themselves, they will be eliminated like everywhere in the world.Not any form of dictatorship and totalitarianism accepted, be its maoism or monarchy.
|
|
|
aakansha
Please log in to subscribe to aakansha's postings.
Posted on 04-17-06 6:52
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
king? what king? do you still think he deserve to be called king? he is a vampire..living monster..gosh..? gayane..king no way..
|
|