[Show all top banners]

bashi_pauroti
Replies to this thread:

More by bashi_pauroti
What people are reading
Subscribers
:: Subscribe
Back to: Kurakani General Refresh page to view new replies
 royal massacre 2001, nepal, a nightmare

[Please view other pages to see the rest of the postings. Total posts: 28]
PAGE: <<  1 2  
[VIEWED 17575 TIMES]
SAVE! for ease of future access.
The postings in this thread span 2 pages, View Last 20 replies.
Posted on 04-09-07 10:05 AM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

Watch the whole story and guess the culprit!!!!!!!!!!!

Part 1
---------




Part 2
-----------



Part 3
-----------


Part 4
-----------



Part 5
-----------


 
sYaKuuRiolAKU_nchImb
Posted on 04-11-07 6:46 AM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

the logic is that all truth has been burried by gyane himself
this is the best logic.
 
Posted on 04-11-07 9:49 AM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

I am so surprized such a majority of nepalese think it was not Dipendra. Just because he went to Eton college, does not mean he is educated. I dont think he even passed. And the only reason he passed at the university in Nepal is coz his father is KIng!!! Obviously they cannot fail him.
Noone liked Dipendra when he was living, and now that he is dead, he is suddenly God and incapable of commiting murder...
Educated people are capable of murder too! FYI
 
Posted on 04-11-07 9:58 AM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

nepalihottie, ok i agree that even eduacated people can commit crime.. but do u have any proof tht dipendra did it?? if i m not mistaken, every law says a person is innocent until proven guilty...soooo.. there is nothing we can do but wait for the proof to be revealed.. until then, if u believe dipendra did it,thats ur believe... i dont believe it.. in the free world, we are entitled to ahve our own opinion right??
 
Posted on 04-11-07 10:02 AM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

I am not trying to prove he did it.. But you cannot fully rule out the possibility that maybe what they are saying is infact true! Just coz everyone hates Paras, you cant just blame him. There is no proof against him either.
Dipendra by the way, flunked out of Eton College.
 
Posted on 04-11-07 10:34 AM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

What does it matter at this stage? No offense to those who like/support the King, but Monarchy for all intents and purposes has been relegated to the history. It sure would be nice to find out the real truth (if it is different from what we know) but I see that as having little bearing on the course the country had chartered for itself.

Just a thought.
 
Posted on 04-12-07 5:28 AM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

it really was disturbing.
 
Posted on 04-12-07 7:06 AM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

.
दरबारी हत्याका हत्याराहरु सबै जिबितै छन...........

खुलेयाम सडकमा हिड्दै छन.............................

मृतकका संपतिका पछि लाग्दै छन......................

भाग्न गन्तब्य दीशा खोज्दै छन्..........................

जहां गए नि सुख भने अबश्य पाउने छैनन्..............
 
Posted on 04-12-07 11:14 AM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

Captain Haddock,
It matters. If we seek the rationale of US bombing Nagasaki (more than half a decade ago), we certainly can seek the reason, proof and logic behin royal massacre which is not even a decade old. Also, the question of relevancy of monarchy in Nepal is quite a seperate topic. The monarchy may be abolished in just two months time frame (if CA verdict say so), still this question of Royal massacre will be an open question. This is an open question to the then security system of Nepal, the then judiciary system of Nepal. Any competent government should solve this unsolved mystry. Even though this mystry happened inside the iron walls where public can not reach, there certainly was law of land. Even if the monarchy's window to public was limited, still the monarcy was constitutinal.

It is not that we are going to find all the proof in this thread. DIfferent people have different opinion and more than that different people have different reasoning/ logical deduction.

Kiran
 



PAGE: <<  1 2  
Please Log in! to be able to reply! If you don't have a login, please register here.

YOU CAN ALSO



IN ORDER TO POST!




Within last 7 days
Recommended Popular Threads Controvertial Threads
I hope all the fake Nepali refugee get deported
Those who are in TPS, what’s your backup plan?
Travel Document for TPS (approved)
MAGA and all how do you feel about Trumps cabinet pick?
NOTE: The opinions here represent the opinions of the individual posters, and not of Sajha.com. It is not possible for sajha.com to monitor all the postings, since sajha.com merely seeks to provide a cyber location for discussing ideas and concerns related to Nepal and the Nepalis. Please send an email to admin@sajha.com using a valid email address if you want any posting to be considered for deletion. Your request will be handled on a one to one basis. Sajha.com is a service please don't abuse it. - Thanks.

Sajha.com Privacy Policy

Like us in Facebook!

↑ Back to Top
free counters