This is complete Foul play of SAN for being NAS .How many know for sure that this is damn true? While NAS is allowed to post in Sajha ( like wild dog) and never banned but others are banned doing the same damn thing.

well..he needs to bring the HITS to www.sajha.com

You need to get your head checked! that's what it is. First off we have gone over n over n over again with this topic and it has been well established that SAN IS NOT NAS, now give it a rest, go home, go to your family set your priorities straight and devote your time somewhere else. Why does this topic keep coming up? why do people have to be so curious? go look up to the sky, you have a better chance of seeing a UFO than proving SAN IS NAS. 

First, flip flop the letters in NAS = SAN. Next, NAS started posting some videos of Kathmandu on the "Nasty videos by NAS" thread sometime ago. Around the same time, SAN also posted some videos of temple/historic sites of Kathmandu. Interestingly, qualities of videos posted by NAS and SAN are the same, taken by same camera or camcorder in the same climetic conditions; SAN "and" or "aka" NAS must have visited Kathmand in last summer. However, whether NAS is SAN or not, most of NAS's pictures/videos collections are interesting except some nasty or dirty pictures in the past. Keep coming NAS with your posts whoever you are.

IF SAJHA BASI ARE REALLY UPSET BY NAS OR SAN; LET US SHOW OUR OPPOSITION TO HIM BY NEVER CLICKING ON HIS POST. AND DARE TO SAY HIM "F_ U_C_K  U".

ARE YOU ALL WITH ME?

jhapali keto ....U need support to say that? GO ahead do it ...i dare you!

ctal your conspiracy theory needs more proof....."same camera" huh? i bet you know the manufacturer ID of those cameras too huh?  and what was the weather like re?? can you post the temperature too please since yer soo into "climetic" condition.....LOL.....

lastly this is a privately owned website FYI.

Lurey, why are you here to defend NAS or to prove that SAN is different from NAS? Unless you are NAS or SAN, you won't be desperately trying to prove that two id's are of different persons. I have no problem if NAS is SAN, I love most of NAS's postings, as I do SAN's. Then about the "conspiracy theory" you dubbed mine posting, I have nothing to say that that was what I felt (I might be wrong as I admitted in my earlier posting by writing "and" or "aka") in those days based on my observations when NAS and SAN's came up in the different Sajha threads. You can search those videos for SAjha links posted by NAS and SAN by their id's and figure out yourself the month/season/climate/temperature of the times NAS and SAN videos were taken in Kathmandu/Patan and the time when they posted the links here on Sajha. You are free to disagree on me

Guys there's another thread HERE on this same issue. I hope it sheds some light.

You can't base your argument on your assumptions and speculations. I happen to know both of them and I strongly disagree with on your remark about Nas and San being the same person. You can come up with any number of controversy theories that still does not change the outcome. sorry!

Lurey

        D

guys, Why does SAN have to post such articles and videos which will eventually hamper his own website.  In fact it is NAS who very cunningly made use the name of SAN . Don't get fooled. 

SAN

 

Who gives a fk about SAN or NAS ? I wanna see more of SITA.

Gimme me some more of SITA the PocaSita from Dallas ...

show some more sita,,  i wanna see her gtting poked and probed????

wtf

What I believe is SAN is loving this conspiracy. One reason could be NAS is very close to SAN and another thing is NAS positing increases the hits (accept it) in sajha which ultimately is the benefit for SAN.

However, I support some issues pulled out here by SK.  I posted thread with pictures of beautiful gals that I liked from the picture that's been public here itself in sajha. I did nothing. I just pulled the picture from SAN's work and pasted it in my thread. I even didn't choose the pictures showing clefts or whatever that we bokas enjoy. Yet, SAN deleted the "thread" and the next time took out the pictures.

SAN, I have a question. Do you have any equal right policy here in Sajha? Why Nas is not treated similarly as fellow citizen here in sajha kingdom? (Nas, nothing personnel. I like and enjoy your work. Keep on). When you deleted first thread you wrote to me" some girl(s) complained". Nobody complains against Nas post? or you have policy of deleting a thread or considering it foul only if the face exposed in the thread complains?

Tell me, was there any changes in the picture that I posted in my thread and that was in your post? both of the times. Can you give me the strong logic?

I don't care whether you are NAS or not. but you certainly have a double standards which I consider NOT GOOD.

NarayangatSuburb,
                  just wanted to let you know, a picture posted by NAS in another thread was deleted and he was banned to write on that thread, I think if the chicks in the pictures send an email to admin, all he can do is pull it out of the thread, try posting one today and let's see how long it will be here,

Bro 1 time ko kura liyera, don't think it will happen all the time, well that is how you develop stuff, you can't just test it once and say if it fails, it's not going to work next time.. try it once post a picture of a chick you want too..

I think there is a difference in posting a picture here in the thread and posting a picture in ramjham??? you know better than that...

Trust me SAN is not NAS .. NAS is too nasty to be SAN hahahaha

I don't think NAS get's special privilages over you or me, maybe he does a lil bit hahaha, but noway josey, next time I see SAN than we have problem (j/k bro)

Tysto hundaina yaar... tysai mancheylai aarpo na laguna yaar..
it has nothing to do with me, but I had to write something when people say bad things about SAN or anyone else here in sajha for the sake of saying it, or they just cooked up something their head and started to think this is the truth....

peace out

I am sorry if my postings hurt SAN or NAS or LUREY on (his or) thier images or feelings.

But, Lurey, San and Nas have left some room to doubt that they are the same person with different ids. I just checked this thread and noticed that San posted something in this thread, followed  by Lurey defending that Nas and San are of two different persons and that he knows both of them, and interesting thing is that the time gap is just of 2-3 minutes between two postings. It seems like San posted and logged out and immediately logged in with the id of "Lurey" and wrote some lines defending his arguments for about 2 mintues and posted.

I admit that observations can be sometimes deceptive, but they also give some hints to develop some theories. And there are always some persons to dub the theories "wrong" or "as the parts of conspiracies."

Sorry again (Lurey aka NAS aka SAN if they all are the same person) or Lurey and Nas and San if they are all different persons. Whoever you are, I love most of your postings. It does not matter whether you all are the same person or different persons. You all simply rock and have made the Sajha attractive and interesting by different ways. 

 

I have been telling this from the very beginning,

SAN = NAS.............no matter how they try to defend.

Now the ramjham is so popular, he simply deleted his postings............

 

 

 

Here we go again gossip lovers, you guys love bedlam don’t you? Few days ago you made Obama a homosexual and now, San has been made Nas once again. If you believe that reversing the letters of one’s name makes him/her a completely different individual, you need to revisit preschool religiously.

 

It takes a level of maturity and sheer endurance to be an admin of common platform like sajha, which is becoming more feral everyday. For those who came in late, you need to track back to the history of sajha to understand whether there always was an existing amity between San and Nas or not. Perhaps San has a reason not to ban Nas, perhaps he did ban him earlier, perhaps he had grounds to bring him back again. That is something November(June)bugs like you would never know.

 

As much as I loathe Nas when it comes to pornography and lewd remarks, I equally admire him for his creativity, profound knowledge and versatility pertaining to the threads he initiates. If you go through the content of his other threads other than the one that are porn-related, he writes and validates his arguments in such a style, it takes light years for you guys to imitate it. There are pros and cons to everything. It is time we tried to view the other side of the story too.

 

The other issue is, have you guys put a little thought about the availability of San and whether or not he has enough bandwidth to filter every thread? If he bans ‘ctal’ today, we will come across a ‘mtal’ tomorrow, and believe me, it has happened time and again. Thoughts about filtering these threads are perhaps underway, but it does not happen overnight. Sometimes, when you cannot cure, you need to endure, and it requires an ample amount of magnanimity to do that.

 

San is a person named San Pradhan who resides in Boston (it is not a personal info even John Kerry would have known by now), and Nas is an entirely different entity.

Couldn't have said it any better than Jet Favre. You guys accusing san being nas need to set your priorities straight. this is a privately owned website and as much as i hate to say this san has all the right to do whatever he pleases to do with his website, though he has been trying hard to please everyone out here which is not possible all the time. Suggestions, feedbacks and criticism has been taken well by san as far as im concerned and he has done an outstanding job of accomodating it. On the other hand, coming out here accusing him on a baseless assumption is something that i feel is just outrageous.