Breaking!! Nepal TPS Attorneys Cite New Court Case(Syria TPS) to Support Ninth Circuit En Banc Petition

Posts 3 · Viewed 2535 · Go to Last Post

· Snapshot 0

Like · Likedby · 0

On March 6, lawyers for TPS holders sent a short letter to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The letter supports their request for the full court to review the Nepal TPS case again. The lawyers pointed to another TPS case in New York where a judge delayed the end of TPS for Syria. They told the court that the government itself says different courts are making different decisions on TPS stays. Because of this conflict, the lawyers argue that the full Ninth Circuit should rehear the case.

Sexy In Sari

· Snapshot 61

Like · Liked by · 0

Source: law360.com

Former Judges’ Brief Flagged in Ninth Circuit Nepal TPS Stay Fight

Counsel for TPS holders from Nepal and other countries notified the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on March 6 that a group of former judges has weighed in on a related dispute over the treatment of unexplained Supreme Court stay orders.

In a Rule 28(j) letter, attorney Ahilan Arulanantham informed the court that 175 former federal and state judges filed an amicus brief supporting respondents in Noem v. Dahlia Doe before the Supreme Court of the United States.

The judges’ brief focuses on how lower courts should treat Supreme Court stay orders that provide no reasoning. According to the letter, that question is directly relevant to the Ninth Circuit’s stay in National TPS Alliance v. Noem.

Arulanantham argued the development strengthens the case for rehearing the TPS dispute en banc, asking the full Ninth Circuit to reconsider the panel’s stay affecting TPS protections for nationals of Nepal and other countries.